Home All Why Not Me? Self-sacrifice As The 25th Strength

Why Not Me? Self-sacrifice As The 25th Strength

written by Sherri Fisher 5 July 2009

Sherri Fisher, MAPP '06, M.Ed., Director of Learn and Flourish LLC, is a coach, best-selling author, workshop facilitator, and speaker. She works internationally with smart people of all ages who have learning, attention, and executive function challenges. Sherri’s evidence-based POS-EDGE® Model merges her expertise in strengths, well-being, motivation, and applied neuropsychology.

Full Bio. Sherri's articles are here.

Arlington Taps

Arlington Taps

Joe, a school custodian, was an Army Ranger during the first Gulf War. He rushed in to save a friend who was hit by a mortar and stepped on a concussive charge which resulted in several serious injuries that ended Joe’s Army career. His friend had been killed before Joe could even get to him.

As a result of his head injury, Joe also lost his fiancée, his excellent social skills,  and the life he assumed he would live. Now he works nights, emptying the school garbage and trimming the shrubbery every now and then while his dog waits in the car. When asked if he wishes things were different, Joe still says, “Yeah, I wish I could have saved Brian. I would have gladly died for him.”

Martin Luther King Jr. Leaning on a Podium

Martin Luther King Jr. Leaning on a Podium

The drive to make a personal difference, whether by living a life of service or rising to the occasion when it becomes clear that someone must, is the essence of self-sacrifice. Ralph Waldo Emerson said, “Self-sacrifice is the real miracle out of which all the reported miracles grow.” Martin Luther King Jr. asserted “every man must decide whether he will walk in the creative light of altruism or the darkness of destructive selfishness. This is the judgment. Life’s persistent and most urgent question is, what are you doing for others?”

In the spirit of PPND’s July theme, I nominate self-sacrifice as the 25th strength, based on the following ten criteria defined by the Values in Action (VIA) project.

  1. It is fulfilling to engage in self-sacrifice, providing a sense of accomplishment beyond mere achievement for oneself. A self-sacrificing individual, for example, while perhaps recognizing competing desires, would naturally choose sacrifice over mere generosity and would feel personal growth as a result. People who give up a high paying job to teach in an inner city school come to mind.


  2. Certainly it is morally valued. And, as Jon Haidt reminds us in The Happiness Hypothesis, observing the self-sacrifice of others can result in elevation. Unlike simply appreciating beauty and excellence, observing self-sacrifice encourages us to behave similarly. While nearly anyone might have the potential to make a sacrifice on the behalf of another, it is a true character strength of only some.


  3. A true self-sacrifice does not diminish others; it builds upon the dignity of others. For this reason suicide bombers are not self-sacrificial. Blowing oneself up may be the fulfillment of a life’s dream and may even be morally valued by one’s culture. However by definition and intent, it diminishes (and literally reduces) others. On the other hand, the peaceful protests of civil rights marchers and lunch-counter sitters demonstrated self-sacrifice even though it exposed them to the risk of being heckled, arrested or even lynched.


  4. Self-sacrifice has non-felicitous opposites including selfishness, coldness, thoughtlessness, inconsiderateness, and egoism, all of which are unappealing.
    Helping Hands

    Helping Hands


  5. Self-sacrifice is also trait-like. The strength of self-sacrifice belongs to the defining essence of a person, and is not merely the result of actions one has willed oneself to do. A self-sacrificing person will easily be identified as such. Self-sacrifice is specifically listed as one of Gordon Allport’s cardinal traits, ones that dominate personality across time and situation, and which when fully developed (likely late in life), might become the most important component of one’s personality.


  6. Self-sacrifice is distinct from other positive traits. It requires acting in ways that promote the flourishing of others rather than merely caring for their momentary need. Profound self-sacrifice may require other strengths such as love, kindness or spirituality to be very highly developed. In fact, nearly all of the other strengths may be the “best supporting cast” which help blend compassion–the sense that we are bound to one another and that suffering must be alleviated, and citizenship–the idea that we are specifically responsible to one another because we share resources. Even temperance strengths such as prudence, modesty and self-regulation which are superficially ones of “not-doing” contribute to the actions of self-sacrifice. A person who gives sacrificially must subjugate one’s own needs on behalf of others, the ultimate in self-regulation.


  7. A striking paragon of self-sacrifice is Oskar Schindler, the Sudetenland war profiteer whose daring opportunism saved over 1000 Jews from certain death in Nazi concentration camps. Despite any number of opportunities to save himself and his wife, Schindler instead found ways to successfully lie to and bribe the SS men who regularly inspected his factory for noncompliance with Nazi Aryanization policies. Remarkably, Schindler survived the war. But clearly he would had to have been willing to die every day. Not so lucky as Schindler were the self-sacrificing van Pels family, who protected Anne Frank and family in their annex despite knowing of the huge risk and improbable success of providing sanctuary to Jewish families. Caught for his devotion to them, Herr van Pels was gassed in a concentration camp.


  8. Self-sacrifice is selectively absent in such people, though it is highly valued and depended upon in civilizations.
    Mother Teresa

    Mother Teresa


  9. Prodigies of self-sacrifice such as Joan of Arc or Sister Teresa are found in the saints of religious history, and more quietly among children who collect their allowance and give it to the poor.


  10. Numerous institutions and rituals support the development and recognition of self-sacrifice. All the world’s major religions value self-sacrifice. Societies in general try to cultivate this strength. In American schools, character development values self-sacrifice through community service of students, and by instituting specific character development goals and curricula, and by naming students for awards when they take action by using this strength.


Self-sacrifice is also a theme abundant in literature, particularly classics read in schools. Charlotte, the gray spider who tends, befriends and ultimately saves Wilbur the Pig in E. B. White’s Charlotte’s Web. She chooses her role in a way that clearly transcends friendship, and uses her signature strengths in the service of her sense of purpose, saving Wilbur from becoming ham and bacon. While she is completely devoted to helping Farmer Zuckerman discover that he is the owner of “some pig”, her “magnum opus”–a case containing her 513 spiderlings—is the achievement of which she is most proud. Her work complete, the languishing Charlotte quietly dies.

In Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird, the wise and open-minded Atticus Finch sacrifices his reputation and nearly his children’s lives when he stands up for integrity, truth, justice and love of humanity, rightly defending a case he cannot win for all the wrong reasons.

Diary of Anne Frank

Diary of Anne Frank

Aristotle entreats us to ask: How ought I to act? What kind of person ought I to be?

Anne Frank noted in her diary, “How wonderful it is that nobody needs to wait a single moment before starting to improve the world.” Moral living–being responsible and responsive to others– requires us to make choices. The simple answer to Aristotle’s questions about our behavior is “self-sacrificing.”

In Tending the Heart of Virtue, Vigen Guroian calls this choice “creative fidelity to a greater good”. Whether it exists entirely separately from the other 24 strengths, is the culmination of them, is its own virtue category, or is some combination of these, self-sacrifice should be included in Peterson and Seligman’s Character Strengths and Virtues.



Frank, Anne (1953). Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl.. Pocket Books, New York.

Guroian, Vigen, (1998) Tending the Heart of Virtue: How Classic Stories Awaken a Child’s Moral Imagination. Oxford University Press, USA

Lee, Harper (2006) To Kill a Mockingbird. Harper Perennial Modern Classics, New York.

Peterson, C. & Seligman, M. (2004). Character strengths and virtues: A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

White, E.B. (2001) Charlotte’s Web. Harper Collins, New York.


Taps at Arlington courtesy of BL 1961

Martin Luther King, Jr. Leaning on a Lectern by Marion Trikosko from Wikipedia Commons

Hands from movit_2it’s flickr photo stream

Mother Teresa by Turelio from Creative Commons Sharealike 2.0 Germany

Diary of Anne Frank from fhenglishlab.wikispaces.com

Not seeing the pictures for the book links? Disable Adblocking for this site to view them.

You may also like


Amanda 6 July 2009 - 2:52 am

Hi Sherri

This is a very thought-provoking piece. While reading, I recalled a recent meeting with a client who works very hard. Their work is their passion, they put their clients first, they take great pleasure in delivering the outcomes. The self-sacrifice comes in the form of personal health issues, and potentially affecting their relationship with their spouse. Could this be a case of a strength over-used?

Yet your first story of Joe who would have gladly died to save Brian, would (to state the obvious) affect Joe’s health, and been very upsetting to his friends/family? Is Joe’s story about a strength over-used, or an act of moral beauty (in Jon Haidt’s words) which inspires us?

Great article – thanks!

Sherri Fisher 6 July 2009 - 9:56 am

Hi, Amanda-
I think you raise some interesting questions. In the case of someone who is working very hard–maybe too hard–I’d wonder if it is not really self-sacrifice but that a need or iceberg belief underlies the negative outcomes. If that were my client, that is a place that I would be heading.

Using one’s strengths tends to make us happier. The fact that Joe exhibited loyalty to Brian that could have resulted in Joe’s death is essential in combat. There are medals to show it is institutionally valued, and while you or I might not be ready to enlist, any, many people do.

Also, our strengths may affect our family in negative ways that are not negative for us. Relationship building and maintenance is full of give and take that way.


Marie-Josee Salvas 6 July 2009 - 3:46 pm

Hi Sherri!

I must say that you make a compelling argument, and I’d like to add a thought.

Buckingham defines strengths slightly differently than Peterson & Seligman: he talks about what we feel compelled to, interested in and excited to do. For him, strengths are the things we look forward to, the things we “get” to do, as opposed to those we “have” to do.

Reading your article, I wondered if self-sacrifice could fit this definition. Maybe it does, maybe it doesn’t, I’m not certain. However, if we used the same concept, but named it differently, then maybe the link gets clearer. What do you think of naming your strength devotion rather than self-sacrifice? It would still fit your full argument, but maybe sound a bit more compelling, less potentially painful.

What do you think?


Sherri Fisher 6 July 2009 - 8:29 pm

Hi, MarieJ–
I am open to calling the strength something different. I chose this term, however, because it is what religious and philosphical traditions call it, and the term shows up in more popular media as well. I wanted something that was unlike the existing VIA terms, too.

I agree that the CSF strengths add something in terms of the need we have to “do” somrthing, and they are not so values laden. I do think, however, that values are an essential part of self-sacrifice, and that it would not have to result in death. Mother Teresa is a paragon of the strength and she lived to old age.

There are combinations of strengths that can become something that is more than the sum of the parts, and maybe this is one of those that becomes something new when we don the mantle.


George Vaillant 7 July 2009 - 8:43 am

Brilliant, Sherri. Thank yu so much. If the list were not graven in stone I would add it’
Warmly, George


Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com