“Boys don’t play with dolls!”
“Girls shouldn’t be loud and boisterous!”
“Don’t be a sissy!”
“No boy is going to like you if you always beat them!”
So what do strongly enforced gender norms have to do with psychological well-being. A lot it seems.
Adultery of the Brain
Strongly enforced gender norms are damaging to both boys and girls, both men and women.
Gender norms are enforced earlier in boys than girls. According to Carol Gilligan, “Among boys between the ages of five and seven, the age when boys who cross gender boundaries are called girls or gay or sissies or mama’s boys, there is a high incidence of learning and speech disorders, attention problems, and out-of-touch and out-of-control behavior. Boys show more signs of depression than girls until adolescence, the time when the division between good and bad girls sets in, enforced by often vicious practices of inclusion and exclusion.”Girls in adolescence begin to commit “adultery of the brain,” according to Gilligan. They learn to cheat on themselves. They can either be true to themselves and keep their honest voices, or they can have friends, fit in, please their parents, and most importantly, earn the approval of boys and men. It’s at this age that girls begin to edit themselves. They self-censor because they learn that to be themselves is too costly.
Gilligan relates an anecdote about Anne Frank, the 13- year-old girl who kept a diary of her time in hiding from the Nazis. Early in 1944, she learned that the Dutch government was going to build a museum to the resistance efforts after the war. Dreaming of becoming a famous writer, she edited 324 pages of her diary for publication because the raw version was too honest. Both versions were found. For the most part, her father published the edited version.
As Gilligan noticed, “Girl’s resilience is compromised when they find that they must silence their voices in order to be accepted and loved. What is socially adaptive is psychologically costly and ultimately politically costly as well.”
I did a TEDx talk entitled Adultery of the Brain: Why Women Commit It and How to Stop.
(Click here to view in Youtube.)
From adolescence through the end of life, girls and women suffer twice the rate of depression as men, according to Nolen-Hoeksema. Strongly enforced gender norms require both men and women to deny parts of themselves. The effects are damaging
Interaction between Gender Orientation and Well-being
An interesting study conducted by September and colleagues measured the relationship between gender orientation and well-being. They labeled personality traits that are associated with the stereotypic feminine gender role as expressive and those associated with the stereotypic masculine gender role as instrumental. Using these labels, they described the following four groups:
- Those who scored high in expressive traits and low in instrumental traits were deemed Expressives.
- Those who scored high in instrumental traits and low in expressive traits were deemed Instrumentals.
- Those who scored high in both expressive and instrumental traits were deemed Androgynous.
- Those who scored low in both expressive and instrumental traits were deemed Undifferentiated.
They had the participants complete three measures: Ryff’s Scales of Psychological WellBeing (PWB); the Clance Imposter Phenomenon Scale (IP Scale); and the Extended Personal Attributes Questionnaire (EPAQ, see article by Spence, Helmreich, and Holahan).
What Did They Find?
- On all the well-being subscales except Positive Relations with Others, the androgynous group scored highest, followed by the instrumental (masculine) group, the expressive (feminine) group, and finally the undifferentiated group. The authors concluded that a combination of masculine and feminine characteristics resulted in the highest well-being.
- Significantly more women than men fell into the expressive (feminine) group as opposed to the instrumental (masculine) group, but 1/3 of the women fell into the androgynous group. The authors concluded these findings reflect a shift away from stereotypic gender roles, particularly among university women.
It makes sense. When we have to deny parts of ourselves in order to be accepted in society, the effect is disorienting and energy draining. Imagine a world where men and women can embrace and exhibit all their qualities. It’s worth striving for.
Hernandez, P. A. (2014). The right reflection: Improving women’s self-acceptance. Capstone for the MAPP program, University of Pennsylvania.
Gilligan, C. (2011). Joining the Resistance. Polity Press.
Nolen-Hoeksema, S., & Jackson, B. (2001). Mediators of the gender difference in rumination. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 25(1), 37-47.
September, A. N., McCarrey, M., Baranowsky, A., Parent, C., & Schindler, D. (2001). The relation between well-being, imposter feelings, and gender role orientation among Canadian university students. The Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 218-232. Abstract.
Spence, J. T., Helmreich, R. L., & Holahan, C. K. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and femininity and their relationships to self-reports of neurotic and acting out behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1673-1682.
Photo Credit: Flickr via Compfight with Creative Commons licenses
Playing with a Barbie house courtesy of Scott Ableman
Statue of Anne Frank courtesy of Jason Pier in DC
Boy building a house of cards courtesy of Chris Kealy
Boys and girls playing together courtesy of evilpeacock