Home All Positive Psychology – Let the Bad Times Roll?

Positive Psychology – Let the Bad Times Roll?

written by Bridget Grenville-Cleave 26 October 2008

Bridget Grenville-Cleave, MAPP graduate of the University of East London, is a UK-based positive psychology consultant, trainer and writer. She is author of Introducing Positive Psychology: A Practical Guide (2012), and The Happiness Equation with Dr Ilona Boniwell. She regularly facilitates school well-being programs and Positive Psychology Masterclasses for personal and professional development. Find her on LinkedIn, Facebook and Twitter @BridgetGC. Website. Full bio. Her articles are here.

Well-being: A Dirty Word?

As an ex-financial controller, I can imagine the furious activity that must be taking place in the finance departments of businesses around the globe as they try to put together realistic budgets for the coming year, after a month of tough-mafic.jpgunprecedented stock market falls, and talk of bail-out and bankruptcies hitting the headlines every day. It’s accepted that uncertainty is one of the hardest things for us to deal with but is the sure knowledge that you’re about to nose-dive into a recession any better? Hmmm, that’s a tricky one.

One knock-on effect of this economic crisis is the growing reluctance of my UK business colleagues to talk about the value of positive psychology at work. On the one hand this is understandable, it hardly seems appropriate to be discussing happiness when you’re not sure if you’ll have a job at all the next day. My experience of working in finance is that the majority of businesses treat staff training and development funds as discretionary spend – so anything that would have been available for well-being interventions all but dries up as soon as there’s a whiff of a potential financial shortfall. And whereas well-being, and the UK government’s interest in it, was getting increasing media coverage over here, it has barely got a mention since the spectre of recession appeared.


When the Going gets Tough…

In reality though, this is exactly the time for positive psychology practitioners to show what it’s really made of, and to dispel the myth that it’s “all about happiness”. I know the Gallup organization has done several studies into the connection between happiness and business productivity, but research carried out with your own clients is hardly objective. And in reality many UK business people fall at the first hurdle – they feel uncomfortable talking about happiness in the first place, so even if the link to increased productivity were cast-iron, I’m not sure they’d be persuaded.

So does positive psychology have a role in today’s business climate? Well, the clue is in the word uncertainty. Having worked in the change management field for many years I know that in reality, most employees don’t welcome change, particularly when it’s forced on them. There may be several reasons for this (the status quo bias, for one), but here I want to focus on perceived control. It’s inevitable that when change is forced on people their sense of control is affected. We know from many studies that have been carried out on perceived control over the years (e.g. Gale & Batty, 2008; Glass, McKnight & Valdimarsdottir, 1993; Grote, Bledsoe, Larkin, Lemay & Brown, 2007; Ruthig, Chipperfield, Perry, Newall & Swift, 2007) that having a healthy sense of control over one’s life, work and environment is important for both physical and psychological well-being. A low, or external, sense of control may result in feeling depressed, anxious and unable to cope.

Developing Resilience and Perceived Control

There’s a role here for positive psychology in business to help their employees to increase their resilience in the face of economic insecurity and the inevitable work and/or personal changes that result from it, as well as to develop the ability to cope with setbacks, whether at work or at home. Starting with general coping strategies, there are really only two possible options to maintain or regain control:


1. change your environment and start to resolve the issues which are causing your stress,


2. change yourself and adjust to the new circumstances so they don’t worry you so much.

[In reality, you may have both, but sticking your head in the sand and doing nothing is not an option – that means you’re not coping.]

change-david-reece.jpgOption 1 sounds straightforward enough, but there may also be a self-efficacy deficit to deal with; perhaps you need to acquire new skills or knowledge in order to achieve such a change. This in itself would help you re-establish a sense of control.

And say you’ve exhausted all the possibilities which fit into Option 1, or that the challenge you face really is outside of your control, what does Option 2 mean? It’s all about developing mental flexibility, i.e. the ability to change the way you interpret what goes on around you. If we turn to Thompson’s (2002) definition of perceived control (“A person’s self-assessment of their ability to exert control”) we can see that three possible courses of action arise:

  • Changing to goals that are reachable in the current situation, i.e. lowering your expectations of what can be achieved in the circumstances.
  • Creating new avenues for control, such as focusing on other life domains where achieving control is more likely, such as in your hobbies.
  • Accepting the current circumstances. As mentioned above, this doesn’t mean doing nothing, it means making sense of the situation in such a way that you can move on from it. There are any number of different techniques which could help here, from Acceptance and Commitment Therapy techniques (Hayes & Stroshal, 2004) to Stephen Covey’s (1989) Circles of Concern model.

Survival of the Fittest?survival-by-_es.jpg

In addition to exploring ways to increase perceived control, we could also consider using resilience models such as ABCDE, or explanatory style – either of these would help develop the flexible thinking patterns that are a pre-requisite for healthy coping. Any or all of these suggested approaches could be used in 1:1 coaching or in groupwork.

There is also the bigger issue of whether positive psychology itself will survive the economic meltdown. Critics often cite the lack of empirically tested interventions as a weakness of this ‘science’. With research funding difficult to find even in the good times, I’m sure many academic researchers have been wondering how they’re going to continue to finance their projects. I think we need to make a concerted effort to ditch the frivolous connotations that the subject has acquired over the past 10 years. By positioning it as a set of tools which businesses can use to increase their ability to cope with adversity, it’s more likely to demonstrate its true value and thus survive into the next decade.

P.S. Reference Gail Schneider’s posting on the topic of the credit crisis on October 23. In the UK we say that London is the financial capital of the world! ;->




Covey, S. R. (1989). The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: Powerful Lessons in Personal Change. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Gale, C. & Batty, D. (2008). Locus of control at age 10 years and health outcomes and behaviours at age 30 years: The 1970 British Cohort Study. Psychosomatic Medicine, 70, 397-403.

Glass, D., McKnight, J. & Valdimarsdottir, H. (1993). Depression, burnout and perceptions of control in hospital nurses. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61(1), 147-155.

Grote, N, Bledsoe, S., Larkin, J., Lemay, E.P. & Brown, C. (2007). Stress exposure and depression in disadvantaged women: The protective effects of optimism and perceived control. Social Work Research, 31(1), 19-33.

Hayes, S. & Strosahl, K. (2004). A Practical Guide to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Springer Edition.

Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J. L., & Thaler, R. (1991). Anomalies: The endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5, 193-206.

Ruthig, J., Chipperfield, J., Perry, R., Newall, N. & Swift, A. (2007). Comparative risk and perceived control: Implications for psychological and physical well-being among older adults. Journal of Social Psychology, 147(4), 345-370

Thompson, S. (2002). The role of personal control in adaptive functioning. In C.R. Snyder & S.J. Lopez (Eds). Handbook of positive psychology (pp. 202-213). New York, Oxford University Press.

1. bazril
2. David Reece
3. Mafic
4. _ES

Not seeing the pictures for the book links? Disable Adblocking for this site to view them.

You may also like


wayne jencke 26 October 2008 - 10:23 pm

Bridget, perhaps we should move on from happy and be content?

Bennet Simonton 27 October 2008 - 7:18 am

Bridget, why not move away from the traditional top-down command and control system of managing people? Forcing things on people is its primary tactic, as if they are robots. This kind of “shut up and listen” approach by its nature demotivates and demoralizes. This kind of disrespect leads them to disrespect their work, their customers, each other and their bosses. Most top-down managers have no clue as to the amount of damage they do, that they are really their company’s worst enemy.

The opposite approach of bottom-up is capable of creating the exact opposite result, a workforce with high morale committed to the making their company a great success. Bottom-up by its nature leads people to unleash their full potential of creativity, innovation, productivity, motivation, and commitment on their work.

In my 30+ years of managing people, it took me 12 years in top-down to realize I could do better and another 12 years to arrive at a management methodology that created what I described above.

To learn more about a superior leadership strategy, please read these Leadership Articles and I suggest starting with the article “Leadership, Good or Bad”.

Best regards, Ben

Bridget 27 October 2008 - 6:21 pm

Hi Wayne
That’s set me thinking. Does contentment have the same appeal as happiness? It seems kind of second best. If there were such a thing as a “ladder” of positive emotions with feeling chilled at the bottom and feeling hot at the top, feeling content would rank lower than feeling happy, wouldn’t it? For instance, I can’t imagine anyone heavily into hedonic happiness wanting to settle for (mere) contentment. But maybe that’s your point…

Also, happy is snappy. “The How of Contentment” (Lyubomirsky) or “More Contented” (Ben-Shahar) just don’t have the same ring…

Bridget 27 October 2008 - 6:45 pm

Hi Ben
Thanks for the great link to the articles, v useful.

Don’t get me started on command & control, or we’ll be here all day! I don’t know how many companies are enlightened these days and how many still operate by old-fashioned command & control, probably more than we think.

In short, I’m more concerned about the companies which claim to operate on principles of empowerment, and just continue to do the command and control thing anyway, as if hoping that none of their employees will notice. I’m sure we all have examples of companies like this.

Nevertheless isn’t it a question of balance? There must be some organizations which fare better (or, at least, are faring pretty well) from a platform which is more like C&C than Empowerment. I can’t imagine that these organizations would embrace PP voluntarily, or that their shareholders would want them to. It all comes down to means and ends, in the end.

waynej 27 October 2008 - 9:37 pm

Bridget – that is my point. In a workshop I get people to list emotions – its always the high energy ones that spring to mind. Despite the research (see http://www.innate-intelligence.com.au/blog/?p=261)that shows that contentment is a power emotion. I suspect that engagement and flow are often characterised by subtle emotions like contentment.

But then who wants to say that they are content – it implies that they are passive.

spencer 28 October 2008 - 7:08 am

wow, superb post. thank you!

Bridget 28 October 2008 - 4:54 pm

Thanks Wayne, I will certainly have a look at the research you mention.

Bridget 28 October 2008 - 5:04 pm

Hi Spencer, thanks for your positive comment! Any chance you could expand on it a little, and tell us what you thought was most valuable?

PS I loved the ‘Making Music With Windows’ posting on your blog – and people say Microsoft isn’t creative!

Bennet Simonton 28 October 2008 - 7:00 pm


You wrote “Nevertheless isn’t it a question of balance? There must be some organizations which fare better (or, at least, are faring pretty well) from a platform which is more like C&C than Empowerment.”

Those who try to do some empowerment still using a C&C model certainly do better than those using only C&C, but a move to bottom-up (close to servant leadership) is rewarded with over 200% per person productivity gains from the balanced state, soaring morale and a workforce that literally loves to come to work. Those who have balance hope that they never come up against a competitor who uses bottom-up and conversion of conformists to being self-directed.

I certainly agree with your PP if it is meant to change the mindset of individuals so that they do not suffer from anxiety, stress or frustration. I use six rationales for helping people to create the most positive attitude and avert stress; choice, take care of #1, take care of #2&3, do unto others as you would have them do unto you, the serenity prayer, and a sense of perspective. I even have a procedure by which to change an dysfunctional habit into a good one.

Best regards, Ben

David C 30 October 2008 - 2:39 pm


I am a financial controller and current MAPP student at Penn. It is heartening to see people involved with positive psychology that have the same occupational background. Keep up the good work!



Leave a Comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com