Parenting & Schools
Business
Happiness Exercises
Health
Relationships
Home » All, Parenting & Schools, Pathway 1 "Pleasure", Positive Feelings, Savoring / In-the-Moment, Strengths, _3 Positive Organizations

Applied Positive Education: Kids and Teachers for the Future

By on May 5, 2007 – 12:31 pm  6 Comments

Sherri Fisher, MAPP '06, M.Ed., Director of Learn & Flourish LLC, is a leader in the field of positive education. An education management consultant and coach, workshop facilitator and author, Sherri uses the POS-EDGE Model to incorporate research-based findings from strengths psychology and behavioral economics into positive, personalized, best-practice strategies for learning, parenting, and work. Full Bio. Sherri's articles are here.



Institutions have many strengths. For one thing, they’ve been around awhile.  For another, they are usually tied to our values and even reinforce them.  But an institution can become “institutionalized” which we equate with stagnation and even decay. Making changes in an institution, even when they are clearly needed, can therefore be extremely difficult.
 
Public education is an institution whose mission is to provide a free appropriate education for its students (FAPE).  It’s not really free, since taxpayers are the funding source. Appropriate is a sticky word, since what is suitable for one child might not be for another. Well-educated, experienced and highly qualified people don’t even agree about what appropriate really means as it applies to education, and as a result, much of what your child may experience in school is dictated not by what is appropriate but instead by what has become law or fashion, or perhaps by which experts guide the programming.

Measuring Success

It’s hard to measure the success of education, since the short-term “profits” of grades, graduation and college admission don’t tell the whole story about future success in work, and the “stockholders” have relatively little influence on the direction of the “company.”
 
Measuring the effects of educational research is notoriously tricky since there are so many confounds (things you cannot really control for) and it is considered unethical to withhold an intervention that you think would really work from a control population, and you aren’t exactly going to be trying something that you think won’t work. Kids are growing up all the while so their development alone may be influencing the effect of an intervention.  Even in the same community students live in different homes, have different families with different values, and have different habits such as watching lots of TV, eating junk food or reading for pleasure. 

Beyond that, education varies widely from community to community, from state to state, hence the intent of books like the Cultural Literacy series which promotes consistent content, and legislation like No Child Left Behind (NCLB) which prescribes consistent minimum standards of achievement. There are many other initiatives and laws, some that affect public schools nationwide, and others that are specific to a particular community. 
 
Take high school graduation requirements as an example. Some schools require a student to take and pass two years of math, and others require three to get the diploma. Some states require an exit exam while others do not.  Tests like the SAT attempt to show prospective colleges what students have learned no matter where they have gone to school. Today, proponents of standardization often cite wide variations in what schools offer or require as the most important factor underlying the outcomes of American public education.
 
You have likely read or heard somewhere that the goal of education is to produce lifelong learners.  In an age of globalization, outsourcing and job creation and elimination, this is quite a task.  The changes we make to education today may take years to manifest in the world of adult workers.  So what makes us think that what we are doing now to reform education will have the outcomes we are seeking in the future?
 

Choosing Learning Outcomes  

Let’s ask some different questions apart from whether students can perform the tasks of standardized testing.  If we are basically using a competencies approach rather than a more “whole person” strengths approach, is this actually adversely affecting some of the outcomes we are seeking from education?  Are there assumptions abut learning and working that might be generating approaches with limited effectiveness over time, even though they might result in schools meeting their AYP (Adequate Yearly Progress) goals?
 
The accountability that both taxpayer and taxing authorities want—proof that education is working—may be encouraging us to spread America’s democratic jelly quite thinly on its multi-grain bread. How then do we support multiple ways to achievement?
 
In Howard Gardner’s latest book, Five Minds for the Future, he identifies the abilities that he believes will be most valuable in the working world of the future.  These are the Disciplinary, Synthesizing, Creating, Respectful, and Ethical minds. Briefly, these are “minds” which will thoroughly know and be an expert in at least one academic discipline; will be able to synthesize information by critically blending knowledge from different disciplines; will be able to use this for both solving and formulating new problems, solutions, and questions; will work well with a diverse group of colleagues, supervisors and employees; and will do all of this with the highest levels of responsibility and integrity.
 
The Creating, Respectful and Ethical minds will require a far more integrated approach to education than is currently available to most students.  They are, however, considered essential strengths in the globalized, diverse and unpredictable work environment of the future. Without an education which supports the whole child, though, only knowledge competencies and perhaps at higher levels, synthesis, are likely outcomes.

Creating Curriculum

Robert and Michele Root-Bernstein propose a solution to this in Sparks of Genius.  They suggest the following:

  • Invention used as a universal part of acquiring disciplinary knowledge
  • Intuition and imagination directly taught and explored through multisensory approaches
  • Arts education on par with sciences, and used as an integrating tool
  • Curriculum integration across all disciplines with a common language that bridges cultures and subject matter and, perhaps most importantly,
  • Educating imaginative generalists—Students with all-purpose skills, adaptable minds, and inventive approaches.

 
In current career parlance, students would become “slashes,” a term that looks like what a person does: “She is a mathematician /artist/ dancer/writer/coach” would be an example.  Adult workers are already doing this multi-role work since the livelihoods of some employees have necessarily morphed to meet the needs of companies and of individuals. Notice that physical and artistic pursuits are counted among this person’s work.
 
A current education initiative which is addressing this is extending the school day (not the same as optional afterschool programs) so that an integrated curriculum, including the arts, will be the common experience of all students; including physical activity such as sports, games, play, and yoga to educate, energize and engage the body as well as the mind; providing time for individual instruction and connection; and bringing back recess. In ten communities from central and eastern Massachusetts where this has been tried, elementary and middle school teachers, kids and parents seem to like it.  Is it effective as well as pleasant?

Applied Positive Education

A challenge before educators and positive psychologists may be this: How can the schools of the present address the needs of the future? The answer may be simpler than we think. We can build fabulous facilities, train, hire and set qualifications for highly qualified school educators and the curriculum they teach, and then pay higher salaries.  But in the end, effective schools may be as much about creating happy schools as they are about enforcing standards. Maybe everyone does not need to learn the same thing.
 

Broadening and Building in the Schools: APP Supports Learning

According to Barbara Fredrickson and her colleagues, unlike negative emotions which call up specific actions, e.g.: fear-flight or attack, the positive emotions are more broadening, e.g.: contentment-savoring. The social, intellectual and psychological resources that positive emotions build are durable, too. People who experience positive emotion show thought patterns that are flexible, creative, open to new information, and they more readily integrate the new and old.  Their cognitive performance is improved, too. I hope you are saying, “Ah, ha!”
 
Howard Gardner’s Five Minds for the Future and Root-Bernstein’s Sparks of Genius identify the kinds of minds and thinking approaches we need and that education must seek to support.  Does the integration of positive psychology research applied to education theory and practical teaching strategies hold the secret to improving education? It’s worth finding out!
 


 
References

Fredrickson, B. L. (2009). Positivity: Groundbreaking Research Reveals How to Embrace the Hidden Strength of Positive Emotions, Overcome Negativity, and Thrive. New York: Crown. (Added later)

Gardner, H. (2009). Five Minds for the Future. Harvard Business School Press.

Root-Bernstein, M. & Root-Bernstein, R. (2001). Sparks of Genius: The Thirteen Thinking Tools of the World’s Most Creative People. Mariner Books.

6 Comments »

  • Elona says:

    Sherri,
    I’ve enjoyed reading this very thought provoking article. Currently schools are obsessed with improving their scores in the literacy and numeracy tests students must write. To that end, there is a huge emphasis on the “basics” meaning reading, writing and arithmetic. It seems here is no time in the school day and the curriculum for anything other than those basics. I really don’t see how arts education is going to be on par with the sciences. I’ve been teaching for a long, long time and sadly I see the English,math and science becoming more and more important and the arts less and less. I’m not even cautiously optimistic on this one.

  • Hi, Elona–

    Nice to hear from you.

    I wonder what would happen if schools figured out (with the help of PP) that happier students and teachers have better attention spans, minds more open for learning, and are more creative and integrative thinkers. We need to show that those outcomes of positive emotion have other desirable outcomes, like increased achievement, lower school violence, etc. Is your school interested in research?

    The extended school day pilot is new. The communities who are trying it are comparing their MCAS scores (the test for that state) to other schools with similar demographics to see whether the longer day, expanded offerings, more individual help and more balanced work/play time correlate with achievement. To even try this out these schools got state grants $$. If it works, more schools will likely try it. That’s when things get tricky.

    My question is whether we can do one better and create happier places, too. All learning is not cognitive, of course. The interest in the emotional side of psychology has been renewed since fMRI studies have shown emotions preceding thinking. There is lots that PP doesn’t know yet. Wouldn’t it be cool to find out what non-cognitive, non-teacher, non-curriculum things matter, too?

    I applaud you for sticking with teaching for a long time. I know how frustrating it is when you know things could be better and instead they seem to be going the other direction. Don’t give up–We need you 🙂

  • Senia says:

    Sherri,

    Very interesting article. It’s almost like you’re thinking ahead – what can schools do to fast forward to kids later going to work – what skills will the kids need? I hadn’t heard of Gardner’s Five Minds – that sounds interesting. Ethical seems especially important given what we’ve seen in business in the past few years.

    Your discussion of strengths vs. competencies in schoolchildren reminded me of Margaret’s discussion of strengths vs. competencies for businesspeople.

    Measuring success is a topic I am very interested in for psychology in general. Since you say schools vary so much city to city, etc., I wonder what other measures of success are possible – measures that really measure effectiveness of schooling. To me outside the school system, the SAT still seems to be a good measure. Do you have other thoughts?

    Senia

  • Hi, Senia-

    Yes, I am always thinking ahead, having the CSF “Strategic” strength. Also, one must have an almost crazy sense/amount of optimism to have this strength and stay in the field of education where institutional progress is typically very slow and out of the box thinking can be really threatening. In public schools your customer grows up and moves on every year. New ones come to replace them. Innovation is typically a push from without. In many independent schools the reverse happens: the customer is growing up and moving on, but innovation is the result of maintaining the “brand” of the school while concurrently meeting the needs of a changing student pool. It’s more like business, where you have a shared enterprise.

    If you don’t look to the future and work both backwards and forwards, I think it can be very difficult to have the opportunity to use what Marty Seligman calls “Command Intuition.” This is the ability to make decisions that integrate everything you have learned or experienced and practiced to successfully face a problem with which you have no prior experience, even something you never imagined. This is not a concept that has been researched in school/teacher leadership, but I think it is relevant as the world of education must step up its pace of change and response—There is no choice.

    You asked if I have other ideas? Do I! (I have “ideation” as well). I also think that measuring success is very important. We need to expand what we measure and value as “success” and decide that maybe it is not all about math and verbal competencies, or test-taking skills. Next month I will be at a conference that brings PP researchers and educators together. I am very excited about seeing how we can partner our interests and applications. I know from years of working with kids, even in places where we all had nearly identical training or where I was the trainer, that not all teachers are the same. I’d love to find a way to match kids with the teachers they need.

    Re: the SAT. Does it measure effectiveness of a person’s education? I’d say maybe, and not for everyone. I work with kids who are brilliant thinkers, but they are not fast test-takers. They cannot compete with the perfect score test-takers, but the quality of their output is often creative, innovative and original. They often have self-regulation in spades and are excited about hard work. (How many teachers would love to have those kids in class?) They persevere and are dependable. If you focus on achievement test scores, you’ll miss this. But we know that in life, these “marshmallow waiters” (instead of eaters) succeed! Another thing to remember is that not everyone needs to go to college, though that is what we are trying to turn high school into: all college-prep, all the time. Students are missing out on technical and entrepreneurial training opportunities. Organizations like Junior Achievement (JA) fill the gap in some communities.

    So many more ideas…a lifetime left to work on them 

    Thanks for writing!

  • Diana Mek says:

    I am presently enrolled in a Bachelors of Science program for applied psychology and am wanting information on the direction to take to become a certified teacher in the positive education disipline can you give me some direction? I am located in the State of Ohio

  • Hi, Diana-
    Can you tell me more about your program? Are you also taking education courses and participating in supervised student teaching? If so, at what level?

    To my knowledge positive education as a discipline is not a subject area for certification in any state. It is not so much a knowledge base in itself as the way that knowledge is embedded in the experiences of an education setting. It’s an approach to working with all of the stakeholders in a learning community, and it would include the classroom experience (teachers, support personnel, and students) as well as the conference room experience (parents and administrators), and the extended community (citizens), too.

    Positive Education practitioners apply their work in numerous settings. I’m so glad that you are interested in it!
    -Sherri

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.