Parenting & Schools
Business
Happiness Exercises
Health
Relationships
Home » All, Conferences, Love, Positive Emotion

IPPA Third World Congress: Opening Words and Hard Choices

By on July 17, 2013 – 9:35 am  5 Comments

Kathryn Britton, MAPP '06, former software engineer, is a coach working with professionals to increase well-being, energy, and meaning in their work lives (Theano Coaching LLC). She is also a writing coach, facilitator of writing workshops, and teacher of positive workplace concepts at the University of Maryland. Her own books include Smarts and Stamina on using positive psychology principles to build strong health habits and Character Strengths Matter: How to Live a Full Life. Full bio. Kathryn's articles are here.



When I think back on the International Positive Psychology Association (IPPA) Third World Congress, held in Los Angeles from Thursday June 27 to Sunday June 30, I find myself wishing I could have been the broom in the Sorceror’s Apprentice: chopped into multiple pieces that regenerated themselves and moved independently. With up to 9 parallel sessions at any given time, there was much to miss in terms of workshops, symposia, posters, and people in the packed four days that I was there.

On the positive side, it was a busy, bustling time, a coming together of people from all over the world to swap information, make new connections, celebrate progress over the last 15 years, and spark ideas for further progress.

Let’s start with the numbers:

1200 people came to the 3rd World Congress from 54 countries. Events started on Thursday evening with a special lecture by Martin Seligman and Roy Baumeister. From Thursday through Sunday afternoon, participants had the opportunity

IPPA Audience

IPPA Audience

  • To hear 10 invited speakers in plenary sessions
  • To attend 49 symposia, each with up to 4 presenters, OR 35 active workshops, OR 17 individual paper sessions, each with up to 3 papers
  • To view nearly 500 posters
  • To visit 19 exhibits, many from educational programs in positive psychology such as the Claremont Graduate program, the Penn MAPP program, the Case Western Reserve MPOD program, and the University of Michigan POS program.
  • To participate in 10 preconference master lectures, putting-in-practice workshops, and research methods workshops. Several hundred people arrived early to take advantage of these training opportunities.

Since I couldn’t split myself like the Sorceror’s Apprentice brooms, I experienced Barry Schwartz’s paradox of choice for practically every moment of the weekend. Fortunately the combined exuberance and the joy of meeting new people and reuniting with old friends counterbalanced the pain of so many lost opportunities. But I still wish I had seized the chance to meet some of the researchers I’ve cited over the years, people like Ed Powley who spoke on organizational healing and Bob Emmons who spoke on the moral architecture of gratitude.

In this article, I’ll give brief summaries of the opening plenary presentations. I’ll return with high points from my experience and the experience of other PPND authors who attended the conference.

Martin Seligman speaking, Roy Baumeister getting ready

Martin Seligman speaking,
Roy Baumeister getting ready

Opening Lecture: Taking the Future Seriously

Martin Seligman speculated that focusing primarily on what happened in the past may be an even bigger omission in psychology than the tendency to focus on the bad things to the exclusion of the good. In fact, the reason that psychology neglected the positive may be because people weren’t thinking enough about the future. Intelligence is not what you know, but how well you simulate the future and act on your predictions. The human edge over other species is our evolved ability to predict the future. In his view, this idea makes many ideas that were opaque before start to become clear. Rather than thinking of people as prisoners of the past, he envisions a new field of study that focuses on imagination and getting better at moving into the future.

Roy Baumeister stated that the future can become involved in creating the present. We have much mental architecture aimed at the future. The same circuits that are involved in replaying the past help us simulate the future. This view makes things that seem like weaknesses about memory, that it is flexible and changes over time, appear to be strengths when viewing memory as instrumental for prospecting the future. Experience sampling shows that happiness is highest with present thinking, while meaning is highest with future thinking. Big questions about the future, such as what makes it real and what constitutes pragmatic prospection, will keep psychologists busy for years to come.

Creativity Map

   Psychological Assets associated with Creativity
    (from work with Marie Forgeard)
   Click to see larger view.

Creativity and Age

Seligman finished the Thursday lecture with a discussion of creativity as people age, presenting a map of creativity from work with Marie Forgeard. As people get older, the conduction speed of their brains gets slower and stamina goes down. But many other aspects of creativity, including the ability to see patterns, positive and negative heuristics, sense of audience, and breadth of exposure to different ideas all go up. He has asked several people, including Aaron Beck in his 90’s, “When in your life were you most creative?” The answer he usually receives is, “Right now.” Perhaps they are right. Rather than being one in a million on one thing, many creative people are one in 100 on several things with a multiplicative effect. The separate elements of creativity, when broken apart, can be learned.

Seligman then stated that strong funding is becoming available for people to study prospection and imagination, including ways to measure, augment, apply them. The goal is to make the world a more imaginative place. Requests for proposals will come out in 2013 and 2014.

Remembering Chris Peterson

Remembering Chris Peterson

“Other People Matter” – How and Why? by Barbara Fredrickson

Barbara Fredrickson dedicated her Friday morning plenary to Chris Peterson, whose summary of positive psychology, “Other people matter,” has helped her conclude that there is one positive emotion that stands out above the rest: love. Love is a deeply physical emotion, felt in the heart, the immune system, and the blood. Positive emotions unlock the ability to focus on other people, making connections to others more salient. People get better at seeing what others see, and divisions tend to fade.

Fredrickson described her definition of love as a mashup of relationship science and emotion science. According to relationship science, love is an investment in others for their own sake along with a return sense being seen, validated, and cared for.

Emotion science adds:

  • A momentary perspective: Love lasts moments, not decades.
  • A biobehavioral perspective: Emotions are fused mind/body events.
  • A broaden-and-build perspective: Micromoments of love can have a cumulative effect.

Fredrickson described love as a positivity resonance, a mini-mind meld, a single act performed by two brains in synchrony. Love is facilitated by sensory connections, including smiles and voice, and leads to real-time behavioral, hormonal, and neural synchrony. Love can be a microment shared with a grocery store clerk, as well as an experience with a loving partner.

Research indicates that cumulating micromoments of love are associated with higher vagal tone, with the heart rate slowing down with in-breaths and speeding up with out-breaths. Higher vagal tone is associated with better attention, better emotional regulation, better social skills, better heart regulation, and better immune function. As she described micromoments of connection to others as little tune-ups to vagal tone, she concluded that love is a vital health behavior. She also pointed people to the Positivity Resonance Web site for guided meditations that can help them increase micro-moments of love for themselves and others.

“Love doesn’t sit there like a stone. Each day it is made anew like bread” ~Ursula LeGuin

IPPA Third World Congress started with fresh views of both the future and love.
 


 
References

For more on prospection and increasing our focus on future, see an interview of Martin Seligman or watch the Youtube video embedded below:

Szalavitz, M. (2011). Q&A: Positive Psychologist Martin Seligman on the Good Life. Time Health and Family.

Seligman, M. E. P. (2012). Prospecting the Future. Thinkers In Residence Youtube channel. Embedded below.

 
Seligman, M. E. P. (2011). Flourish: A Visionary New Understanding of Happiness and Well-being. New York: Free Press.

Seligman, M. E. P., Railton, P., Baumeister, R., & Sripada, C. (draft). Drawn into the Future or Driven by the Past.

Baumeister, R. & Tierney, J. (2012). Willpower: Rediscovering the Greatest Human Strength. Penguin Books.

Fredrickson, B. L., Coffey, K.A., Pek, J., Cohn, M.A., & Finkel, S.M. (2008). Open Hearts Build Lives: Positive Emotions, Induced Through Loving-Kindness Meditation, Build Consequential Personal Resources. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 1045-1062.

Kok, B.E, Fredrickson, B.L. (2010). Upward spirals of the heart: Autonomic flexibility, as indexed by vagal tone, reciprocally and prospectively predicts positive emotions and social connectedness. Biological Psychology.

Kok, B. E., Coffey, K. A., Cohn, M. A., Catalino, L. I., Vacharkulksemsuk, T., Algoe, S. B., Brantley, M., & Fredrickson, B. L. (in press). How positive emotions build physical health: Perceived positive social connections account for the upward spiral between positive emotions and vagal tone. Psychological Science.

Fredrickson, B. L. (2013). Love 2.0: How Our Supreme Emotion Affects Everything We Feel, Think, Do, and Become. Hudson Street Press.

Fredrickson, B. L. (upcoming). LOVE 2.0: THE MASTER CLASS: Helping Clients Create Happiness and Health in Moments of Connection Through the Science of Positive Emotions. Class sponsored by Mentorcoach. Begins Sept 24, 2013.

Britton, K. H. (2011). What is love anyway? Positive Psychology News.

Schwartz, B. (2004). The Paradox of Choice: Why More Is Less. New York: Ecco.

Images
Sorceror’s Apprentice brooms from the Disney Wikia article on Fantasia
The rest of the pictures are used courtesy of Lisa Sansom

5 Comments »

  • oz says:

    Kathryn – Go vagal tone. Looks like I’m about 15 years ahead of positive psychology.

  • Thanks for the great overview and summary of some key presentations Kathryn. Very helpful reminders of what I learned there.

    It was wonderful to meet you in person at the event! 🙂
    –Scott
    Scott Crabtree, Chief Happiness Officer, http://www.HappyBrainScience.com

  • Judy Krings says:

    Hi, Kathryn,

    Super summary. I closed my eyes and pretended I was there. Thanks for making IPPA’d Third conference come alive, Kathryn. Loved the video of Marty here and Barbara Fredrickson’s tribute to beloved Chris Peterson. Many thanks.

  • Thanks for the overview Kathryn – and I’m glad you found some pictures to use! 🙂 I still have to go through my notes, but I have very fond memories of the event. Wish it could have gone on forever – the learning and community were fantastic!

  • David Hopkins says:

    thank you so much for writing and posting this great summary!
    I feel privileged to have a further insight into what it was like. cheers

  • Call for proposals on Prospection research now available, as described here:

    Subject: Templeton Science of Prospection Research Awards RFA
    Date: Tue, 03 Sep 2013 17:02:42 -0400
    From: Peter Schulman

    Templeton Science of Prospection Research Awards Request for Applications

    Supported by a grant from the John Templeton Foundation, the University
    of Pennsylvania Positive Psychology Center has established the Templeton
    Science of Prospection Awards to advance research the scientific
    understanding of prospection, or the mental representation of possible
    futures.

    Up to fifteen (15), 22- to 24-month grants averaging $150,000 will be
    awarded to researchers worldwide who hold the Ph.D. or equivalent, are
    at the rank of Assistant, Associate, or Full Professor, and have
    maintained their own independent laboratory for no more than 12 years.

    Research topics of interest include, but are not limited to,
    explorations of the following domains of prospection: Measurement,
    Mechanisms, Applications, Improvement, ‘Open’

    To Apply: Interested applicants should submit a Letter of Intent and a
    Curriculum Vita by January 1, 2014. The official Request for Proposals
    and application details for this opportunity
    can be found on the
    Prospective Psychology website.

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.