Parenting & Schools
Business
Happiness Exercises
Health
Relationships
Home » All, Optimism, Pathway 3 "Meaning", _3 Positive Organizations

Social Activism: What works?

By on October 7, 2007 – 8:39 pm  15 Comments

Kathryn Britton, MAPP '06, former software engineer, is a coach working with professionals to increase well-being, energy, and meaning (Theano Coaching LLC). She teaches positive workplace concepts at the University of Maryland. She recently published a book,Smarts and Stamina, on using positive psychology principles to build strong health habits. Her blog is Positive Psychology Reflections. Full bio. Kathryn's articles are here.



Are you passionate about a social cause such as environmental protection or civil rights? Are you looking for a way to have a positive impact on the world? Do you wonder what kinds of collective action have real, beneficial, and substantial impacts?

Dissertation Research on Social Activism: What Works?

Social Forum in Paris

     Social Forum in Paris

I’ve just returned from the Global Well-being Forum where I learned many fascinating things. Of all of them, the one that I can’t wait to pass on is Scott Sherman‘s research on social activism, as described in his dissertation, Strategies for Success in the Environmental Justice Movement.

Scott analyzed 60 case studies of activism against incinerators, toxic wastes, polluting industries, and other locally unwanted land uses (LULUs) occurring in neighborhoods already suffering disproportionately high rates of exposure to environmental hazards. In particular he analyzed the differences between cases where they failed and others where they succeeded. How? When? Why? Where? He explored 117 different variables, including some about the context (Was it a Democratic or Republican administration?), the nature of the opposing force (Was it a large company, a small company, a local government, state government, federal government?), how the group framed the mission, and what actions they took.

To be considered successful, an action had to meet at least one of the following criteria: It met its immediate goal, such as preventing local dumping of toxic wastes, or at least caused major concessions. It had unexpected positive outcomes, such as the Love Canal work resulting in changes to law. People involved continued with additional social activism.

Factors NOT Associated with Success

Here are some things that were not associated with success:

  • Going through the courts probably because of the high cost of legal action.
  • Using science, because the opposing side countered with their own hired experts.
  • Using the political process.

So what DID work??
Sherman names it Transformative Action and describes it as the intersection of nonviolent social action with positive psychology. Nonviolent social action we know about from Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr.. Positive psychology, in this case, means turning the focus away from opposing the negative towards finding a positive win-win answer. This intersection involves 3 types of action:

  1. Speaking the truth to power in ways that people can hear. Consider the wisdom from Elijah Muhammad cited in the Autobiography of Malcolm X (Haley, p. 209): “Don’t condemn if you see a person has a dirty glass of water… just show them the clean glass of water that you have. When they inspect it, you won’t have to say that yours is better.”
     
  2. Reframing a win-lose position as a win-win position in a way that expresses good will toward the opposition. He called this Social Aikido. I’m looking forward to reading his dissertation or other sources for examples of the ways that successful groups did this.
     
  3. Creating a vision of a better future that includes the needs of both sides.

Overcoming Learned Helplessness

For years I’ve been in a state of learned helplessness about social activism. Learned helplessness occurs when people have learned to believe that they have no control over a situation so whatever they do is futile. That makes them stay passive in the face of unpleasant or harmful situations, even when they actually do have the power to cause change. While I’ve heard Margaret Mead’s words, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it’s the only thing that ever has,” I’ve never really found them particularly empowering.

Scott Sherman’s talk inspired me. First, I was struck by the wisdom of studying what works in a disciplined, empirical way.  It honestly never occurred to me that this could be done.  Second, the answers make sense to me, based as they are on the positive psychology concepts that i have studied for more than 2 years. Third, I can now imagine successful social activism — I am emerging from the helplessness I learned from my own experience with social activism in earlier years.

Scott Sherman lives by what he learned. He and a partner have established the Transformative Action Institute and teach the principles of transformative action. For more information, see their publication, How David Conquers Goliath: The Power of the People to Overcome the World’s Largest Corporations and Governments.


References

Haley, Alex (1964). The Autobiography of Malcolm X: As Told to Alex Haley. New York: Ballantine Books

Peterson, C., Maier, S. & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Learned Helplessness: A Theory for the Age of Personal Control. New York: Freeman.

Sherman, S. (2003). Strategies for success in the environmental justice movement. University of Michigan dissertation. AAT 3106161.


Image
Social Forum Paris courtesy of Darij & Ana

15 Comments »

  • Jeff Dustin says:

    OOOOOOOOOOOO! I really really enjoyed this piece, Kat. What a big difference you’ve made in my day. Thanks a million! PS Tell me more.

  • I’ve been corresponding with Scott Sherman about this article and his work:

    Me: I attended your session at the Global Well-being Forum. It was honestly the most inspiring message that I heard — among many. Today is my day for writing the article on Positive Psychology News Daily so I wrote it about what I heard. I’d be very grateful if you’d look at my article, Social Action: What works? Anything that needs correcting? Or is there a comment you’d like to append to it?

    I tried to include links to information for people who want to go further. However I found that the materials page on your Web site has a non-functional link (Click here for … –> takes you nowhere.)

    Scott: That’s a terrific article! Thanks for the kind words. Honestly I think you’ve done a perfect job summarizing the main points. So there’s nothing that needs to be corrected.

    I’ll have to contact my webmaster about the broken link, but this may take a while, because she has a lot of clients. So meanwhile it’s fine if you put my e-mail address in the article and send people my way if they want materials:  ssherman@transformativeaction.org

    Me: OK with you if I post your note as a comment to the article?

    I’m a little intimidated by the idea of reading a 500 page dissertation, but I’d love to have examples of these actions — of telling the truth to power, social aikido, and vision of the future. For many of us, it is hard to imagine a mutually beneficial change, and imagination is where it all starts.

    Have you ever seen Robert Wright’s book, Non-zero? He argues that history has involved moving from win-loss to win-win at larger and larger scales as the social organism becomes more and more complex. In fact existing win-loss situations often provide the propelling force toward win-wins. Many of us don’t see this ourselves because we take the existing win-wins for granted and we don’t see things at a scale that shows the movement to win-win. Marty Seligman told us that he thought this was a very important and compelling book — so you might find it useful in your teaching.

    Scott: Please feel free to post my note. … I can sit down and write at greater length about some inspiring examples of transformative actions.

  • Elizabeth says:

    This link works, to purchase the dissertation.

    http://wwwlib.umi.com/dissertations/cart?add=3106161&track=pq&dlnow=1

  • Every time we say or write the words “non-violence,” we are using the word “violence.” The inadequacy of this term illustrates one of the big contributions of positive psychology: that the good is not equal to the absence of the bad. It is much more. For example, a good marriage is much more than the absence of the qualities that make a marriage bad.

    Scott Sherman sent me a chapter from his dissertation that covers the theory of transformative action — not a perfect term, but reaching for something beyond “not the bad thing.” It includes this quotation.

    Arun Gandhi, the grandson of the pioneer of these methods, explains:

    The greatest challenge in promoting nonviolence is the English language and its limitations…. When my grandfather Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi developed his philosophy of nonviolence in South Africa and wanted an appropriate word to describe it, he could not find one…. He even offered a reward to anyone who could come up with a positive English word to describe what he had in mind. Alas, no one could. (Collopy 2000, 38)

  • Leslie Pitner says:

    Kathryn,

    Thanks for this article! I missed Scott’s talk in D.C.(which I am very sorry about now!), but you communicated his inspiring message loud and clear.

    Leslie

  • [...] about Social Activisim Jump to Comments My latest article in Positive Psychology News Daily is called Social Activism: What Works? It isabout a session at the Gallup Well-being Forum 2007 where Scott Sherman talked about what does and does not work with social activism. He wrote a dissertation on the analysis of 60 case studies involving social action against locally unwanted land uses – or LULUs (what a wonderful acronym). [...]

  • Friends,
    I’ve continued this discussion in my blog. That involved pulling in Robert Wright’s book, Non-zero. Did you know there are excerpts of every chapter available on the Web? There is also a terrific video of Bill Clinton talking about Non-zero and its significance for the 21st century, a time of growing global interdependence. Check it out – http://theanocoaching.wordpress.com/2007/10/11/thoughts-about-social-activisim/.

  • Isaac Bashevis Singer said in his book, In my Father’s Court:

    It is my firmest confiction that the court of the future will be based on the Beth Din, provided the world goes morally forward instead of backward. Though the Beth Din is rapidly disappearing, I believe it will be reinstated and evolve into a universal institution. The concept behind it is that there can be no justice without godliness, and the best judgment is one accepted by all the litigants with good will and trust in divine power. The opposite of the Beth Din are all institutions that employ force, whether of the right or of the left.

    He defines Beth Din as an ancient institution that started whn Jethro counseled Moses to “provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness … and let them judge the people at all seasons.”

    The book is a very interesting collection of stories about the court held by his father. My husband came across this book as part of the Western canon that he is working his way through. I am glad he shared it with me.

  • Senia says:

    Kathryn,
    Singer is my all-time favorite author of all time. That’s a great book. I like all his short story collections. Thanks,
    S.

  • [...] full story here Der Beitrag wurde am Sunday, den 7. October 2007 um 19:39 Uhr veröffentlicht und wurde unter social activism abgelegt. du kannst die Kommentare zu diesen Eintrag durch den RSS 2.0 Feed verfolgen. du kannst einen Kommentar schreiben, oder einen Trackback auf deiner Seite einrichten. Einen Kommentar schreiben [...]

  • Elizabeth says:

    I am so grateful that Kathryn wrote about this topic! I am typing away right now at a law school paper and I am heavily citing Scott’s dissertation, as to why litigation is inadequate as a method of social activism, etc etc. I’m so happy to be able to include positive psychology in my legal studies.

    ~~E

  • Thanks for posting, Elizabeth. Why not think about sharing the paper with Scott Sherman when you are done? Or perhaps submit a precis as a guest article for this site?

  • Elizabeth says:

    Hi Kathryn,

    I would love to share the paper (once the final copy is completed in December) with anyone who is interested. My discussion of Scott’s dissertation is only a part of the paper, but it still might be of interest to Positive Psychology folks.

    I’m very interested in the potential intersection of Positive Psychology and social activism, so if you come across any further research, make sure to keep us posted!

    Elizabeth

  • [...] work, which I hope to get published as a paper in 2008. I also heard Scott Sherman speak about Social Action that works. In his dissertation research on social action movements, he stumbled on some of the same ideas [...]

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.