Parenting & Schools
Happiness Exercises
Home » All, Global Policies, Money, Parenting & Schools, _3 Positive Organizations

For Our Non-Readers…

By on January 13, 2007 – 5:00 am  8 Comments

Giselle Nicholson Timmerman, MAPP '06, has over nine years of experience working as a strategy consultant and leadership coach in the Americas, Europe, and Middle East. Giselle has pioneered the application of positive psychology to strategy, leadership, and organizations. She has seen the field develop firsthand and is fortunate to collaborate with the very best practitioners in the world via her collaborative consultant network, Positive Work. Giselle serves as President-elect of the Work Division for the International Positive Psychology Association. Full bio. Giselle's articles are here.

I’m ecstatic! I look around and feel like positive psychology is everywhere! I’m thrilled that The Economist is exploring what role the market has for our personal happiness and how the New York Times explains the practical application of positive psychology. But then something causes me to wonder, what’s missing?

Essentially, it is the more than four billion people at the bottom of the pyramid (those who earn less than $2 USD per day) that aren’t being directly exposed to positive psychology like most of us are. We are so fortunate to have access to so much information that can make our lives happier, more meaningful, and more fulfilling. However, when we explain how to improve goal-setting, increase employee engagement, or practice gratitude, are we really expecting those who live their lives surviving day-to-day to care about these positive interventions? Why not? Wouldn’t they benefit from positive psychology?

There’s no doubt that positive interventions can remarkably change people’s lives, so what happens when those who are less fortunate than us are able to have the same opportunity to change their lives? It’s more challenging to study and measure, but I think that our next big step is to explore the profound potential that positive psychology has for the lives of those who probably aren’t frequenting websites like this one.

Much of the current surge of media interest in positive psychology stems from the marriage of economics and psychology. Researchers are captaining the effort to examine how subjective well-being fits into our political estimations and policy evaluations of how to assess the well-being of a society. Happiness is a construct that is difficult to measure, but measures of subjective well-being are valid and reliable.

The Gallup Organization has taken the helm and is measuring the well-being and overall status of a representative sample of 95% of the world’s adult citizens over the next 100 years. The European Social Survey has also started incorporating measures of well-being and other positive psychology-like measures into its biennial survey that covers over twenty nations. The New Economics Foundation has even made something called the Happy Planet Index, which is an index of human well-being and environmental impact.

Positive psychology research has primarily focused on the West and thus lacks studies in countries where subjective well-being is low and tends to ignore low-income economies. Ed Diener and his son Robert Biswas-Diener have been pioneers in the study of well-being across cultures. More research will not only benefit those in developing countries, but exploring subjective well-being around the world will likely add much value to our understanding of the various factors that influence the happiness of those in the West. As the ken of positive psychology widens its scope and becomes more commercialized, we must be cognizant of where it can do the most good for the most people.

A Financial Drain
Courtesy of las - initially

One example of how positive psychology could greatly widen its scope is to reexamine some empirical findings. Researchers have empirically verified that income makes little to no difference to subjective well-being once a person makes $50,000 USD. We can take that empirical statement and ask ourselves, “What kind of difference does an increase in income make to those who earn under $50,000 per year?” Not only could this question tease apart the significant relationship between income and well-being for those at the bottom of the pyramid, but it would also help those of us at the top to better understand where and how happiness is found. The relationship between money and happiness has to be thought about at all levels of income.

Furthermore, positive psychology has made leaps and bounds in understanding how education is tied to well-being. It’s phenomenal that the Geelong Grammar School in Australia is incorporating positive psychology into its curriculum. This will undoubtedly have a significant impact on how these students will develop and impact the world. But how about Oprah’s new Leadership Academy for Girls in South Africa? Imagine if positive psychology principles were incorporated into this school from its inception. Moreover, what are these emerging female leaders in developing countries going to teach us about leadership?

These are some of the questions I’ve been thinking about lately and enjoy researching. As positive psychology globalizes we must be conscious that it doesn’t obfuscate and exclude certain people. I look forward to exploring just how much influence the vox populi has on the application of positive psychology around the world and how new endeavors will concern the voices that aren’t being heard.


  • Margaret says:

    Giselle – thank you for your global perspective! I often struggle with the applications of Pos. Psych. – like the Geelong School – an already priviledged group of students. From what I’ve read/heard about Oprah’s Leadership Academy for Girls, Pos. Psych. principles are at the very foundation of the school. I, too, look forward to what these girls can teach us. And, I just know I can look forward to the good YOU will do in the world! Warm regards, Margaret

  • Dana says:

    Hey Gig! Great, insightful article, and so consistent with your research interest in economic development…As pos psych gains popularity in the US and Europe, it will be interesting to see how it can be applied to lower income countries, and you rightly point out that it can and should be done co-terminously with efforts to promote it in the Geelongs…you also write very well…I had to look up “vox populi” hahah 🙂

  • Hi Gigi,

    I think you’re right on. Positive Psychology does have an opportunity to help people everywhere, not just the privileged. I am glad your work has been focusing on how to do this. Keep us all posted on the bridges you continue to build.

    And great point about really working back on the $49,999 and below number. We could learn a lot!

    Warm Regards,


  • […] I have never seen a powerpoint presentation with so many great pictures as the one prepared by Robert Biswas-Diener about his experience traveling around the world and studying happiness, with pictures he took in Kenya, Greenland, and many other countries. Apart from appreciating his amusing presentation style, I enjoyed the meaning in his talk.  I was inspired by the idea of developing cultural awareness of applied positive psychology, especially in developing/non-industrialized countries (as Giselle Nicholson writes about here and here). […]

  • […] into account the effect of our lifestyle on other people and on the planet in general (see articles here, here, and here by Giselle […]

  • […] New Economics Foundation或能給出部份答案:在上周的應用正面心理學碩士課堂(MAPP class)上,很幸運得到Nic Marks 為我們講及快樂跟持續發展的關係。他提出了NEF的One Planet Living模式,為上述的兩難問題帶來灼見。簡單而言,所有快樂之道都不可行,我們必須考慮到對自己及他人的生活形式,以及地球整體的影響(見Giselle Nicholson的文章 here、here及here)。 […]

  • […] New Economics Foundation或能给出部份答案:在上周的应用正面心理学硕士课堂(MAPP class)上,很幸运得到Nic Marks 为我们讲及快乐跟持续发展的关系。他提出了NEF的One Planet Living模式,为上述的两难问题带来灼见。简单而言,所有快乐之道都不可行,我们必须考虑到对自己及他人的生活形式,以及地球整体的影响(见Giselle Nicholson的文章 here、here及here)。 […]

Leave a comment!

Add your comment below, or trackback from your own site. You can also subscribe to these comments via RSS.

Be nice. Keep it clean. Stay on topic. No spam.

You can use these tags:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

This is a Gravatar-enabled weblog. To get your own globally-recognized-avatar, please register at Gravatar.